Rakesh Sharma and Anr. v. Icici Bank Limited
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No, SA/EEa/2024 R.kesh sharma & Anr. v5. ICtCt Bank Llmited
Date of order Order wlth tlgnature
Slgn.ture ot
order No,05 PrGsGnt !
Dt.23.02.2026
Sl.No.30
For Appllcant : Ld, Counsel
For Defendant : None Ms. Kasturl Dasgupta
U|/532/2026 ls taken up for hearlng.
Heard Ld. counsel for the defendant bank,
Ld Counsel for the Appllcant filed I.A. No 532 ol 2026
praylng for wlthdrawal of the maln S.A. The appllcatlon ls
supported by Affldavlt of the appllcant no. 1, Mr. Rakesh
Sharma.
Durlng the pendency of the S.A. the matter has been
settled wlth the Respondent Bank and the Respondent Bank is
not golng to continue wlth the instant proceedlng and has
lssued a'No Dues Certltlcate'. Accordlngly, the lnstant I.A. is
allowed and stands disposed of belng dlsmlssed as withdrawn as
settled amlcably.
S.A, No.888 of 2024 atong urith all other pendlng I.A.s, lf
any, ls dlsposed of as wlthdrawn.
Flle be conslgned to Record Room aft€r observlng all
formalltles.
--FiErir/Madhav
Preslding Officer
DRT-2, Kolkata
Additlonal Charge of DRT-3, Kolkata
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rakesh Sharma & Anr.
- respondent
ICICI Bank Limited
Coram
Ms. Kasturl Dasgupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court