Yash Singh v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Having
Case brief
What is this about?
The application was dismissed in default as the applicant was absent and had not filed any instructions with the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 27
Case No. SA/81/2023
YASH SINGH Vs HINDUJA LEYLAND FINANCE HAVING
Date: 19.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the applicant has already pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant. Today, none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default on account of non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
YASH SINGH
HINDUJA LEYLAND FINANCE
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court