The Debts Recovery Tribunal Jaipur disposed of an appeal as infructuous after the respondent bank withdrew the notice under Section 13(2) of the R&T Act.
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 42
Case No.SA/785/2025
S R LOGISTICS Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
Date: 13.01.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Kuldeep Yadav, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the Respondent
In this matter, counsel for the applicant appears and submits that the notice issued by the respondents under Section 13(2) has been withdrawn by them, so SA may be disposed of.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the applicant, this SA stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
S R LOGISTICS
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
