Disposed
Dayal Barman v. Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.
DRTSA/77/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 82
Case No. SA/77/2025
DAYAL BARMAN Vs TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD
Date: 16.02.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms. Meeta Pareek, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI along with authorized officer Sh. Sumit Mathur
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Dayal Barman
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court