Allowed
srikarampullaiah v. Canara Bank
DRTSA/71/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
During a securitization application before a Special Lok Adalat, the respondent bank filed a memo for withdrawal. The tribunal permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The securities application is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
BEFORE THE SPECIAL LOK ADALAT DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL II - HYDERABAD
¶2
AWARD
¶3
DATED: 25.04.2026.
¶4
IN
¶5
SECURITIZATION APPLICATION NO: 7 L I 2O26
¶6
Present:
¶7
- Sri Rameshwar Kothe, Presiding Officer. 2. Sri R. Rajendra Prasad, Member.
¶8
- Ms. P. Tarangani, Member.
¶9
Reference made by:-
¶10
Applicants through: Respondent through:
¶11
Mr. B. Vikram, Advocate. Sangeeta Jaiswal & Associates, Advocates.
¶12
Between:-
¶13
Sri Srikaram Pullaiah & Others.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Sri Srikaram Pullaiah & Others
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
AI extract
Sri Rameshwar Kothe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court