Disposed
Raj Kumar Bera v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/682/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
^ DEBTS RECOVERY TRTBUNAL-3, KOLKATA
¶2
Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶3
| CaseNo.SA/ | 6a2l2022 M/sRaj KumarBera &Anr.Vs.St India&Anr. |
ateBankof |
|---|---|---|
| Dateof Order |
Orderwithsignature | Officeaction withdateand datedsiqnature ofparties when necessaty |
| OrderNo.09 pt.2a.o7.2026 Sl. No.10 |
Present: -For SAapplicant :LdcounselMsMiliMondal -For RespondentBank :LdcounselMr.Debasish Sahawith Mr.JyotishmanSarkar |
|
| Ld counselfor theApplicant has moved I.A. alongwithputuppetitionbeingI.A.1861/2026. l.A.L86O |
2O26has beenplaced prayingfor ofSAin view of thecompromisethat tookplace 7460/2026 theparties.Prayerisallowed. TheLA.issupportedbyan affidavit affirmedbythe applicant.Nodue certificatehasbeenannexedwiththe instantI.A. withdrawal inbetween |
|
| Ldcounselforrespondentbanksubmitsthatthe matterhasbeensettledwith thebank. |
||
| Accordingly,I.A.No.1860/2026isdisposedofasnot pressed. |
||
| I.A. 186U2026isalsodisposedofbeingputuppetition. 3A16A212022alongwithotherpendingI.A.(ifany)is disposed of. Filebeconsigned formalities, toRecord Roomafterobserving ArbindMadhav PresidingOfficer DRT-2,Kolkata AdditionalchargeofDRT-3, Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
M/s Raj Kumar Bera & Anr.
- respondent
State Bank of India & Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Arbind Madhav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court