The Application was dismissed in default because the applicant failed to appear or instruct counsel on the hearing date despite notice.
None. Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 77
Case No. SA/641/2025
GANPATRAM GADIYA LOHAR Vs EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Date: 29.01.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Vineet Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Today, despite pass over the matter none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default on account of non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
GANPATRAM GADIYA LOHAR
EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
