In a Securitization Application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, where the applicant was absent, the tribunal disposed of the matter as infructuous upon counsel for the respondent bank stating the account was regularized.
SA disposed of as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 62
Case No. SA/617/2026
SONU SHARMA Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
Date: 25.08.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Ms. Jona Nagpal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands regularized and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infructuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank and also considering the fact that none appeared on behalf of the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SONU SHARMA
ICICI BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
