The Securitization Application was disposed of as infructuous. The applicant did not appear, and the respondent counsel submitted that the account was closed.
The Securitization Application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 87
Case No. SA/566/2022
HANUMAN PRASAD MEENA Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
Date: 29.01.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank and also considering the fact that none appeared on behalf of the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Hanuman Prasad Meena
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
