In SA/528/2024, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, dismissed the application for non-prosecution. Counsel informed the court that the applicant could not be contacted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 91
Case No.SA/528/2024
MS VIJAYLAXMI FILLING STATION Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Date: 22.01.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Kapil Kumar Kumawat, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Dhruva Rathore, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, on last date of hearing, counsel submitted that the he could not contact the applicant and today also he is submitting the same statement that his client could not be contacted.
In view of the above, this SA stands disposed of as dismissed for non-prosecution, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MS VIJAYLAXMI FILLING STATION
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
