Namonarayan Sharma v. Au Small Finance Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, the applicant failed to appear. Due to the default, the application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 35
Case No.SA/528/2023
NAMONARAYAN SHARMA Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 19.03.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Ayush Kumar Jain, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
None appeared on behalf of the applicant despite Passover.
In view of the above, SA stands disposed of as dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Namonarayan Sharma
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court