This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 58
Case No. SA/511/2023
AMBALAL RAJPUROHIT Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
Date: 20.05.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Rajkumar, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Abhishek Bhandari, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the respondent bank submits that borrower has second time broken the locks and reenter the premises. The bank may lodge a police complaint and police is directed to ensure to maintain law and order situation as and when the bank officer goes to take possession within 10 days from today.
Since twice the amount of Police Japta has been deposited by the bank and in fitness of the case the police authority should not demand more money from the bank for police Japta as it is a public money and they are also discharging public function. Let the bank approach the concerned Police Authority.
Counsel for the applicant submit that he has already intimated the borrower who has broken the locks and re-enter the premises, therefore, he withdraw his Vakalatnama.
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands dismissed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Ambalal Rajpurohit
ICICI Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
