The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of the appeal as infructuous because the Debtor submitted that the account had been regularized by the bank. All pending interim applications were also disposed.
The appeal stood disposed of as infructuous; all pending IAs stood disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 67
Case No.SA/460/2024
PRABHU RAM BANJARA Vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
Date: 27.01.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Bhoop Singh Gurjar, Counsel for the Applicant
Ms. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that the account has been regularized and SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent, SA stands disposed of as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
PRABHU RAM BANJARA
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
