The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of a Securitization Application as infructuous because the respondent bank submitted that the account had been closed.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 48
Case No. SA/455/2025
KAILASH DEVI JAIN Vs SMFG GRIHASHAKTI INDIA HOME FINANCE COMPANY
Date: 20.02.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Prashant Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Jitendra Choudhary, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
KAILASH DEVI JAIN
SMFG GRIHASHAKTI INDIA HOME FINANCE COMPANY
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
