Application filed in SA/45/2026 before DRT-I, Chandigarh was dismissed in default as the applicant failed to appear on the date of hearing.
Application dismissed in default due to non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/45/2026 SATISH KUMAR SACHDEVA Vs ICICI HOME FINANCE LTD.
07.09.2026
Item No.3
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Manav Singal, Counsel for respondent FI.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:10 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Satish Kumar Sachdeva
ICICI Home Finance Ltd.
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
