The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of the application as infructuous since the respondent bank de-sealed the property and handed over possession to the applicant.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/419 12023 GANESH KUMAR Vs SBFC FINANCE LIMITED
29.07.2026
Item no.22
Present Ms. Nitya Sharma, counsel for applicant. None for respondent bank/ no.l.
Mr. Gulshan Kumar, counsel for respondent no.2.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the respondent no.1 has de-sealed the subject propefi and possession was handed over to the applicant. Therefore, she has requested to disposed off the matter. Request is allowed.
Despite repeated calls, no one is appeared on behalf ofthe respondent no.1.
In view of the above submission, the subjectproperty was de- sealed andpossession was handed over to theapplicant. Therefore, thepresent SA is disposed offas infructuous.
File be consigned to record room.
g,\ (susHIL KUrvfix RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Ganesh Kumar
SBFC Finance Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
