10' To substantiate their contention, the Respondent fired material documents along with the Repry liled by them. As per the said documents, it is clear that the Respondent issued demand notice dt. 11.1O.2021 u/s 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2OO2 and sent the same to the Applicants through Regd.post as evidenced by the postar track reports fired by the Respondent' when there is no response to the said demand notice, the Respondent issued possession Notice d,t.2g.o4.2022 and sent the said notice to the Applicants through Regd. post as evidenced by the postar track reports filed by the Respondent. The said possession notice was published in English and Telugu daily newspapers as evidenced by the copies of paper publication filed by the Respondent. However, no documents are filed by the Respondent to prove that the said notice is affixed on the schedule property. But mere non-affixture of the possession notice on the schedule property particularly when the Applicant is having knowledge of the possession notice issued by the Respondent, cannot be a ground to challenge the said notice. when the borrower received the possession notice and the said notice is also published in two daily newspapers including one in vernacular language, even if the said notice is not affxed on the secured asset, it cannot be a ground for the borrower as the affixture is meant only for the general public. In this regard, the Hon'ble High court o! Andhra pradesh rn ilr/s sofithro prrvate Lrmrted. vs. The Debts recotnry zfrbunar-r, reported, tn 2org scc onlrne Hgd f 88, has held in paragraph 17, which is as follows:
