This dispensatory order allowed the applicant to withdraw her Securitization Application (SA). The Presiding Officer directed the respondent bank to release the original title deeds of the property in Ambala if they agreed under the settlement.
Application withdrawn; Respondent bank directed to release original title deeds at Ambala if per settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 89
Case No. SA/412/2023
SUSHILA KATARIYA Vs AXIS BANK
Date: 29.01.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Tanuj Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Abhishek Bhandari, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that he wants to withdraw this SA and prayed that the respondent bank may be directed to release the original title deeds of the property situated at Ambala.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of.
The respondent bank may release the original title deeds of the property situated at Ambala, if they agreed under the settlement to the borrower/applicant.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SUSHILA KATARIYA
AXIS BANK
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
