The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Delhi, dismissed a stay application in default due to non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Stay application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/399 12024 SMT RACHNA MOONA Vs HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
24.08.2026
Item no. 33
Present:
None for applicant.
Ms. shivangi Pandey, proxy counsel for respondent FI.
Matter ls taken through video conferen cingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present sA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
"'..'-'-^, g"\ . (susHrl KU rdAR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, Delhi
A
Rachna Moona
Hinduja Housing Finance Limited
sUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
