In Shobha Bhansali Vs State Bank of India, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Siliguri, in hearing an application supporting an Internal Memorandum (I.A.) No.1027/2026 filed by the bank, dismissed the matter due to non-prosecution by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/38/2026
Shobha Bhansali Vs State Bank of India
Applicant
Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary.
Item No.07 Order No.07
10.09.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Ms. Shakshi Agarwal on behalf of Mrs. Puja Bhupal.
No one appears for the applicant. I.A. No.1027/2026 has been filed by the bank challenging the maintainability of the case but the applicant is not participating in the hearing and on previous date of hearing also no one had participated in the hearing by the applicant and as such the case is dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Let the matter be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.
Digitally signed by RAKESH RAKESH PATI TIWARI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.09.11 17:32:26 +05'30'
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application is maintainable given non-participation by the applicant.
Shobha Bhansali
State Bank of India
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
