Harshwardhan Duggal and Others v. Central Bank of India and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
An application under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act was listed for arguments. The tribunal adjourned the matter to a future date before the scheduled sale of secured assets, requiring the respondent's representative to file a Power of Attorney.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHANDIGARH
ITEM NO. 16
SA/37/2026 HARSHWARDHAN DUGGAL AND OTHERS Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
22.01.2026
Present: Sh. Gaurav Thakur Advocate for Applicants Sh. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate for Respondents (through VC)
This fresh SA has been placed before me today.
Heard. This Securitization Application was filed under section 17(1) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, for setting aside all actions taken by the respondent under the provisions of the above said Act.
Sh. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate appeared through video conferencing and submitted that he has filed his Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondents today vide diary no. 1500, which is taken on record. Power of Attorney be filed before next date fixed.
Sh. Gaurav Thakur Advocate submitted that he has provided complete set of paper book to associate of Sh. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate, who is present in the Tribunal House. It was further submitted that sale of secured asset is fixed for 03.02.2026, therefore any date may be fixed before it. Not opposed by respondents.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Harshwardhan Duggal and Others
- respondent
Central Bank of India and Another
Coram
Mridulesh Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court