The Special Admission (S.A.) stands dismissed as the Applicant failed to appear without representation on the listed date, implying a lack of interest in pursuing the case. Pending Interim Applications are disposed of.
S.A. No.37 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of. Pending IAs disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 22.05.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.37 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Ms Lisa Kinny i/b M/s. Raval Shah & Co., Advocate for the Respondent No.1. None for other Respondents. |
|||
| None was present for the Applicant on previous date i.e., 23.04.2026. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.37 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
|||
| su - 22 | Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent No.1
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
