Application dismissed in default by the Debts Recovery Tribunal for non-prosecution as the applicants did not appear on scheduled dates and were not pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-Il,Delhi
sA/3s9 l2o2s MUKESHCHAND SHARi4A Vi TTTI HOME FINANCE LTD * CHANDSHARMA
Item no.05
23.0L.2026
Present:None for aPPlicant. ,,,.r.'inOe'rt'itSisodia' Counsel for respondentFI
*lr4atter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybridmode'
t
Noneappearedonbehalfofthe.applicantont2.t2.2025and 07.01.2026.None appearedtoday.It appearsthat the applicants arenotinterestedinpursuingthecase.Hence,thepresentSAis dismissedindefaultfornon-prosecution.
File beconsigned to records'
€^ (SUSHIL KUMARRASTOGI) PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-II,Delhi
c
Mukesh
Chand
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
