The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Section 31 application in default due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite a notice and lack of interest in pursuing the case during a video conference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
ANUP CHAKRABORTY AND ANR Vs IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD
24.08.2026
Item no. 28
Present
None for applicants. Shri Naresh, proxy counsel for Shri Mukul Bhimani, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
File be consigned to records.
4j\ (SUSHIL KUMAR, RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
ANUP CHAKRABORTY AND ANR
IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
