An applicant failed to appear before the Debt Recovery Tribunal despite repeated calls. The Tribunal dismissed the special application in default for non-prosecution.
Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl347l202s
RAMA SHANKAR VERMA VS DHFL NOW PIRAMAL CAPITAL
2t.08.2026
Item no. B
Present: None.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested inpursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SA is dismissed in default fornon- prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
14:
(susHrl rufinn RASToGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Rama Shankar Verma
DHFL Now Piramal Capital
RastoGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
