Hdfc Bank Ltd. v. Yes Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL.3, KOLKATA Order Sheet (Continuation)
case No. sA/34612024 HDFC Bank Ltd. & Anr. Vs, yes Bank Ltd.
Office action
Date of Order with signature
Order dated Signature -l
Ords N0,07 I
0t-10-09.2-025 Presentl
Sl. No.18
For SA applicant
: Ld counseMs Aparajita Rao
For Respondent Bank
: Ld counsel Nls Chaitali Acharjee
Ld counsel for the Applicant has moved I.A, 2405/2026 along
with put up petjtion being t.A.2392/2O26,
LA. 2405/2026 has been placed praying for wtthdrawal of SA
in view of the fact that there is no claim remains of the applicant
against the defendant No.1 as the property has been sold by the
defendant No.1-
The l.A. is supported by an affidavit affirmed by one of the
authorized officers of the applicant bank.
Ld counsel for respondent bank raises no objection to the
contention of the SA applicant.
Ld counsel for SA applicant appears virtually and submits that
SA applicant does not want to proceed with the instant
proceeding.
In the light above, as the SA appltcant does not want to
proceed with the instant proceeding, .A.2405/2026 is afiowed
and is disposed of as not pressed.
1.4.2392/2026 being a put up is also disposed of.
SA/346/2024 along with other pending I.A. (if any) js disposed
of.
File be consigned to Record Room after observing all
formalities.
Ar6iiid Madhav
Presiding Officer
DRT-2, Kolkata
Additional charge of DRT-3,
Kolkata
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
HDFC Bank Ltd. & Anr.
- respondent
Yes Bank Ltd.
Coram
Arvind Madhav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court