The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a Securitization Application because the applicant had not instructed counsel and failed to deposit the last installment required for the settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 39
Case No. SA/344/2023
RAMGHANI BAI Vs MUTHOOT HOME FIN INDIA LTD
Date: 19.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Sharad Joshi, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the respondent bank submits that the matter stands settle, but last installment has not been deposited by the applicant.
Counsel for the applicant has pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant.
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands dismissed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Ramghani Bai
Muthoot Home Fin India Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
