Dismissed
Aar Pee Impex Trough its Prop Pooja Gupta v. Punjab and Sind Bank
DRTSA/336/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
AARpEE rMp=r.Tldi{i'rt#3i1, poo,A GuprA vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
25.08.2026
Item no. 19
Present: None for appticant. Mr. Vishwa Bandu, proxy for Mr. Sumeet Batra, counsel for respondent bank.
Matter is taken through video conferen cinglhybrid Mode.
The Ld. counser for respondent bank has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite repeated cails, no one appeared on beharf of the appricant. It appears that the appricants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present sA is dismissed in defautt for nonprosecution
File be consigned to records.
€J.
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
AGRAAR MADYA PARTNER
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court