The Special Appeal was dismissed in default. The applicant/entity did not appear or prosecute the matter despite issuance of a default notice, leading to the court deeming them uninterested and disposing of the appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/33612023 SIDHI VINAYAK ENTERPRISES VS CANARA BANK WADHWAN
29.01.2026
Item no.45
Present None for applicant Ms. Seema Gupta, Counsel for respondent bank
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybridmode.
None appeared on the last date of hearing on behalf ofthe applicant. Despite issuance of defaultnotice none appeared today. It appears that the applicants are notinterestedin pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
;r
(susHl L KU r'fAR'nRSTOCI; PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, DCIhi
SIDHI VINAYAK ENTERPRISES
CANARA BANK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
