was rejected vide order dated 20.06.2024. Thereafter, Bank approached the CJM, who allowed the application vide order dated 29. 10.2025. Applicants have challenged the order dated 29.10.2025. It is stated that the Bank tiled a false affidavit before the C JM, as it did not disclose in the application that earlier applications had been filed before the DM. It is alleged that the notice under Section 13(4) was issued four times. The first notice was issued on 08.08.2018, which was withdrawn. The second notice was issued on 19.11.2019, which was also withdrawn. Again. notices were issued on 09.02.2021 and 19.02.2021. Accordingly, it is stated that the CJM was not justified in relying on the notice under Section 13(4) dated 19. 1 1.2019, which had already been withdrawn. It is also alleged that in the notice under Section 13(2), the date of NPA was not mentioned. Further, the CJM did not look into the notice under Section 13(2). It is alleged that the Bank has indulged in forum hunting. It is further alleged that Kamla Devi, Respondent No.4 in the application filed before the CJVI, appeared through counsel and brought to the notice of the C JM that the Bank had earlier filed applications before the DM and that the notice under Section 13(4) had been withdrawn multiple times. On these facts, it is alleged that the application be allowed, the notices issued under Section 13(2) and 13(4) be set aside, and the order dated 29. 10.2025 be set aside.
