In SA/33/2026, the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh dismissed the application in default due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite prior notice and the time being 01:00 p.m.
dismissed in default application filed by the applicant
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/33/2026 M/S SHREE TIRUPATI FINISHER Vs CITY UNION BANK LIMITED 14.07.2026
Item No.46
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. S.C. Prajapati, proxy Counsel for Mr. Nitin Grover, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
M/s Shree Tirupati Finishes
City Union Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
