Applicant through Regd.Post and the Applicant also admitted the receipt of the said notice. when the Applicant failed to comply with the said demand notice, the Respondent issued possession notice dt.26.o2.2024 u/s 13(a) of the SARFAESI Act, 2oo2 and sent the said notice to the Applicant through Regd. post. The Applicant also filed copy of the said possession notice along with the SA filed by him. The said possession notice was published in Te1ugu and English daily newspapers as evidenced by the copies of the paper publication filed by the Respondent. However, no documents are filed by the Respondent to prove that the said possession notice is affixed on the schedule property. But mere non-af{ixture of the possession notice on the secured asset particularly when the borrower is having knowledge of the possession notice issued by the Respondent, cannot be a ground to challenge the said notice. When the borrower received the possession notice and the said notice is also published in two daily newspapers including one in vernacular language, even if the said notice is not affixed on the secured asset, it cannot be a ground for the borrower as the affixture is meant only for the general public. In this regard, tl:e Hon'ble High court of Andhra prad.esh in M/s sotithro Priaate Limited vs. 'fhe Debts recoaery Tribunat-L reported in 2olg scc online Hgd. r88, has held in paragraph 17, which is as follows:
