Nurnesha Bibi and Anr. v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal at Siliguri noted that no appearance was made by the respondent bank during the hearing held on 14.09.2026 regarding IA-cases 986 & 987/2026 in SA/305/2026, despite a resolution of the bar being represented. The court adjourned the matter to the next listing date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI IA-case no.986 & 987/2026 in SA/305/2026
Nurnesha Bibi & Anr Applicant Vs UCO Bank Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary.
Item No.30 Order No.03
14.09.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicants : Mr. Koushik Modak, virtual mode and Mr. Prasanta Dey, physical mode.
Counsel for the respondent bank : None.
Hearing is made in hybrid mode.
No one appears for the respondent bank but today there is one Resolution of the Bar and thus list this matter on 21.09.2026.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.09.15 TIWARI 19:17:30 +05'30' (RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nurnesha Bibi & Anr
- respondent
UCO Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court