The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a Section 305 application filed against a housing finance company for default and non-prosecution as the applicants failed to appear in person or via counsel despite notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/3Os l202s PIYUSH ARORA AND ANR VS HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
24.07.2026
Item no. 28
Present:
None for applicant.
Ms. Shivani Pandey, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Gaurav Srivastava, Counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ hybrid Mode.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant on 03.t2.2025 and 21.05.2026. Despite issuance of default notice none appeared today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present 5A/30512025 is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
c<br>
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
c
Piyush Arora and Anr
Hinduja Housing Finance Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
