Ms Shiny George and Anr. v. South Indian Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovela Tribunal-Il, Delhi
s[l29212O2s
MS SHINY GEORGE AND ANR Vs SOUTH INDIAN BANK
26.0s.2026
Item no. 30
Present: None for applicant.
Mr. S.K. Garg, counsel for respondent bank.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent bank has appeared today before this Tribunal. :.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested inpursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
.or(.i
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MS SHINY GEORGE AND ANR
- respondent
SOUTH INDIAN BANK
Coram
HUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court