10' In order to prove their contentions, the Respondent filed material documents along with the Reply filed by them. As per the said material documents, it is clear that after classifying the loan account of the Applicant as NPA, the Respondent issued demand notice dt. 14.0 7.2023 u/s 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and sent the said notice to the Applicant through Regd.post and the said notice was arso published in two daily newspapers and the Applicant also admitted the receipt of the said notice. The Applicant alleged that in response to the said demand notice dt'14'o7'2o23, the Appricant submitted objections/reply vide notice dt'26.o9.2023 and filed copy of the said objections/notice but not fired any material to prove that he sent the said objections/notice to the Respondent and so, the contention of the Applicant that the Respondent failed to comply with sectionl3(3A) of the SARFAEST Act, 2oo2 is not tenable. Thereafter, the Respondent issued possession notice dt. 15.0 6.2024 u/s 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2oo2 and sent the said notice to the Appricant through Regd. post as evidenced by the postal track reports filed by the Respondent. The Applicant also fired copy of the said possession notice along with the SA fired by him. The said possession notice was published in Telugu and English daily newspapers as evidenced by tl:e copies of the paper publication filed by the Respondent. However, no documents are filed by the Respondent to prove that the said possession notice is affixed on the schedule properties. But mere non-affxture of the possession notice on the secured asset particurarry when the borrower is having knowledge of the possession notice issued by the Respondent, cannot be a ground to challenge the said notice. when the borrower received the possession notice and the said notice is also pubrished in two daily newspapers including one in vernacurar language, even if the said notice is not affixed on the secured asset, it cannot be a ground for the borrower as the t only for the general public. In this regard, the Hon Prad,eshln LI/s Soltthro prtuate Llmlted. Vs. reported tn 2078 SCC Onltne Egd. ,which is as follows:
