In matter SA/277/2025, the Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of the application after a discrepancy arose regarding the applicant's knowledge of an Off-Take Sale Terms (OTS) agreement for Rs. 28.00 Lacs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/277/2025 GURJANT SINGH CHEHAL Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
27.01.2026 Item No.20
Present: Mr. Mohan Parsad, proxy Counsel for Mr. Ashutosh Bajpai, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Vivek Verma, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Verma, states that there is an OTS between the parties for a sum of Rs.28.00 Lacs, which has been accepted by the applicant. However, counsel for the applicant states that he was not aware of this fact. In view of this, SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Gurjant Singh Chehal
State Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
