The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application filed by Md. Shihanul Islam against Punjab National Bank without hearing, as no one appeared and the challenged sale notice did not materialize.
Application dismissed; file consigned to Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/26/2026
Applicant
Md. Shihanul Islam Applicant Vs Punjab National Bank Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary. Item No.14 Order No.11 04.08.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicants : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Dipankar Saha.
No one appears for the applicant and on previous date of hearing also no one had participated in the hearing and submission of the Ld. Counsel of the respondent bank is that actually the case was filed challenging the sale notice which did not materialize.
In this view of the matter, the case is dismissed .
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the tribunal.
Digitally signed by RAKESH RAKESH PATI TIWARI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.08.05 18:43:15 +05'30'
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application filed to challenge a sale notice that did not materialize should be allowed in the absence of the applicant and without challengeable material.
Md. Shihanul Islam
Punjab National Bank
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
