The Debt Recovery Tribunal disposed of Section 13(2) and 13(4) notices by writ application as infructuous since the respondent bank had withdrawn the said measures prior to the hearing.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/258/2026
Shree Rirupati Enterprises & Ors Vs
State Bank of India
Applicant
Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary.
Item No.07 Order No.03 07.09.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : Mr. Deborshi Dhar, physical mode.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Sagnik Bhowmick, virtual mode and Mr. Bishal Bhattacharjee, physical mode.
Hearing is made in hybrid mode.
The Ld. Counsel of the respondent bank informs the Tribunal under instruction that the measures against which the S.A. was filed i.e. 13(2) notice and 13(4) notice have already been withdrawn by the respondent bank and accordingly, the S.A. is disposed of as infructuous.
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI TIWARI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.09.08 16:06:45 +05'30' (RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Shree Rirupati Enterprises & Ors
State Bank of India
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
