This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/239 12022 RAM PAL GOYAL Vs IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
20.03.2026
Item no. 41
Present: None for applicant.
Mr. Suraj Kundu, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
gJ
(SUSHIL KUMnx RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
RAM PAL GOYAL
IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
