Dismissed
samir osmesh karnik v. Bank of India
DRTSA/238/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 21.08.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.238 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Sudhir Gupta i/b Mr O.A. Das, Advocate for Respondent No.1. None for other Respondents. |
|||
| su - 39 | Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 21.07.2026 shows no representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.238 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent No.1
- respondent
other Respondents
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court