Dipesh Sharma v. Icici Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application as infructuous because the underlying account with the respondent bank had been regularized.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-fl, Delhi
sA/23s l2o2s DIPESH SHARMA Vs IcIcI BANK LTD
L9.03.2026
Item no.26
Present: Mr. AK Sharma, Counsel for applicant Mr. Rakesh singh, counser for respondent bank
Matter is taken through video conferencing/Hybrid mode.
The Ld. counsel for respondent bank has submitted that the account has been regularized therefore, the sA has become infructuous.
The Ld. counsel for the applicant submitted that the has no contact with the client. As the account has already been regularized therefore, the 54/235/2025 has become infructuous and is liable to be dismissed.
The 5A/23512025 is dismissed as infructuous.
File be consigned to record room.
SA (susHrl KUi(AR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dipesh Sharma
- respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd
Coram
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court