Mr Manish Kumar Pandey v. Axis Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite a pass over, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, dismissed the Securitization Application in default for lack of prosecution.
Due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite a pass over, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, dismissed the Securitization Application in default for lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 17
Case No. SA/229/2025
MR MANISH KUMAR PANDEY Vs AXIS BANK
Date: 02.02.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Abhishek Bhandari, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Today, despite pass over the matter none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default on account of non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MR MANISH KUMAR PANDEY
AXIS BANK
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court