In the absence of applicant representation due to lack of client instructions, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application in SA/218/2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/218/2025
Applicant
M/s Saha Enterprise & Anr Applicant Vs Bank of Maharashtra Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary.
Item No.24 Order No.07
10.09.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. S. Deb.
No one appears for the applicant on previous date of hearing the erstwhile Ld. Counsel had abstained to participate in the hearing as any instruction was not being receive from the client and today no one is participating in the hearing for the applicant and as such it seems that the applicant has got no interest in the matter and accordingly, the case is dismissed .
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.
Digitally signed by RAKESH RAKESH PATI TIWARI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.09.11 17:36:15 +05'30' (RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
M/s Saha Enterprise & Anr
Bank of Maharashtra
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
