Sri Indrajit Sharma v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant withdrew the case. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the matter as withdrawn without going into its merits and consigned the file to the record.
What did the court decide?
Case dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
SA/217/2024
Sri Indrajit Sharma Vs UCO Bank
Applicant
Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary. Item No.29 Order No.14 07.08.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : Mr. P.K. Sikdar, physical mode.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Debanjan Chakraborty, virtual mode and Ms. E. PPortal along with Law Officer, Mr. Amit Kumar, physical mode.
Hearing is made in hybrid mode.
The Ld. Counsel of the applicant submits that the applicant is not willing to proceed further in this matter and he is withdrawing the case and as such the case is dismissed as withdrawn without going into the merit of the matter.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sri Indrajit Sharma
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court