The Tribunal disposed of the application as infructuous because the applicant had regularized the account and paid all dues, rendering the respondent's notice under Section 13(2) and 13(4) ineffective.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA l2Ll2O26
SAMEER GAUR VS ADITYABIRLA HOUSINGFINANCE LIMITED
29.05.2026
Item no.01
Present: Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Counselfor applicant Mr. Ashish K Singh, Counselfor respondentFI
Matter is taken throughVideo Conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for theapplicanthas submitted that the account has been regularized andall the dues of the respondenthas already beenpaid. Therefore,the notice issued underSection 13 (2) and 13(4) has becomeinfructuousand the SA may be disposed of accordinglY.
The Ld. Counsel forrespondent FI has not opposedthe prayer of the applicant.As the account has becomestandard and the action taken by therespondent FI has becomeinfructuous including the demandnotice, therefore,the SA is disposed of as infructuous.
The date alreadyfixed on 06.O7.2026 beforethis Tribunal stands cancelled.
File be consigned torecord room.
gA\ (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, DCIhi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Satvyu is to be disposed of as infructuous given that the account has been regularized and all dues have been paid.
Whether demand notices issued under Section 13(2) and 13(4) have become infructuous upon regularization of the account.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sameer Gaur
Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
