Dismissed
Poonam Duggal v. Capital Small Finance Bank Limited
DRTSA/21/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application dismissed in default as the applicant failed to appear for the third hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/21/2026 POONAM DUGGAL Vs CAPITAL SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
02.09.2026
Item No.8
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Counsel for the respondent bank (on VC).
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Poonam Duggal
Capital Small Finance Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court