The applicant appeared in person by none. The Presiding Officer noted the repeated failure of the applicant to pursue the matter and treated it as default.
Application dismissed in default due to non-appearance by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/209/2026
SH KARAJ SADHU Vs SMFG INDIA HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
07.09.2026
Item No.5
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Vikas Bali, Counsel for respondent FI (on VC).
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:10 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
SH KARAJ SADHU
SMFG INDIA HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
