The Presiding Officer upheld the submission that the contested account was already regularized, leading to the disposal of the appeal as infructuous.
Appeal disposed of as infructuous; pending IAs also disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item no.35
Case No.SA/3/2026
SANGITA Vs INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
Date: 09.02.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Mohd Haris, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel along with Ms. Akansha Sharma, Authorised Representative for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the applicant submits that they want to regularize this account, on the other hand, respondent counsel submits that the account has already been regularized and possession also has been handed back to the borrower.
Considering the submission made by respondent counsel, this SA is liable to be disposed of and Accordingly, SA stands disposed of as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
SANGITA
INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
