On averting that no one appeared for the applicant despite a default notice, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the special application in default for non-prosecution.
Dismissal of the special application in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl21202s
MR RAM NIWAS SHARMA Vs PIRAMAL CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD NOW DHFL PIRAMAL CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD NOW DHFL
25.02.2026
Item no. 48
Present: None for applicant.
Ms. Ritu Raj, counse! for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are notinterested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
.\
9I' (susHrl KUMAR nnsrocr) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
MR RAM NIWAS SHARMA
DHFL PIRAMAL CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD
KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
